The underlying theme of the 'Shark Tank' TV series is for either the Sharks (the investors) or the entrepreneurs (pitching their business) to convince the other side to accept their valuation of the business and negotiate a deal based on it. The entrepreneurs tend to come in with high valuations, while the Sharks counter with lower valuations.
How the entrepreneurs and the Sharks value the businesses presented on the show will likely vary, but a good valuation of a company takes into account certain factors such as present value, future value, the value of companies similar to it and risk.
The Game Face Shark Tank
Current Market Valuation
Nov 10, 2016 Dallas Innovates talks about 3 Shark Tank companies based in the DFW area. For seven seasons, the hit show Shark Tank has put aspiring entrepreneurs in front of a panel of shark investors to pitch their ideas, inventions, and companies. A fortunate few secure an investment from one or more of the sharks, who include Dallas Mavericks owner Mark. Oct 24, 2016 Shark Tank is a reality series which gives aspiring entrepreneurs the chance to present their business ideas to a panel of “Shark” investors, who will either choose to invest or not. The panel of “Sharks” is made up of some of the most successful businessmen and women in North America who are capable of taking these start-up businesses to another level.
Using the present value method to determine a company's current market valuation is based on comparing the entrepreneur's business to similar publicly traded companies and sectors or industry average financial ratios. Every sector and industry has financial metrics that are easy to find. A market capitalization value is derived based on the shares outstanding and the stock price. Common financial metrics such as price-earnings (P/E), price-sales (P/S), earnings per share (EPS), sales and income growth rate can be useful in determining a reasonable valuation.
For example, if an entrepreneur is pitching a clothing brand with $1 million in annual sales with $100,000 in profits, the entrepreneur may apply the metrics of the specialty retail apparel sector by using data to determine that the sector has an average P/E of 20.17 as of October 2018.
At 20.17x earnings, this would value the business at $2.017 million. Based on this valuation, the entrepreneur can justify the deal for a 10% stake in the business for a $200,000 investment from the Sharks. This would be based on current valuation.
![Game Face Shark Tank Value Game Face Shark Tank Value](/uploads/1/2/4/9/124911012/813382442.jpg)
Future Market Valuation
- 25 Best and Most Outrageous Shark Tank Products From the Show 2016 NFL Game Day Face - licensed by the National Football League Easy to Apply Peel-Away Removal Water-Based Application FDA Approved Materials Trim-to-Fit Size Made in the USA See Application Instructions GameFace Masks - This could be great for RS game days!
- GameFace Company – 2018 Update From Shark Tank. His dream consisted of the clear and vivid image of two fans at a football game, their faces were covered in face-paint that was messily.
- The Gameface Company full face temporary tattoo peels off fanmask paint costume masks camoflauge makeup Halloween football sport promotional parties soccer.
The entrepreneur may forecast 100% annual earnings growth for the next three years, which is not hard to do with small numbers. This is based on estimates that include $400,000 in net income in year three at 14.75x forward earnings, putting the future valuation at $5.9 million.
Based on the future valuation, the entrepreneur could offer the deal at a 3.3% stake for $200,000 initially. After being laughed at by the Sharks, the entrepreneur could apply a generous discount – cash now is worth more than cash later – and could increase the proposed stake to 6.6% for the $200,000.
Peer-Based Valuation
The Sharks could counter that offer using a P/S ratio with a real-life example like The Gap (GPS), assuming a P/S ratio at the time of 0.65. Applying the same ratio to the $1 million in annual sales would place a current valuation on the small business at $650,000. The Sharks can then apply a three- to five-year sector annual EPS growth rate of 11.94% to derive a year-three income of $135,820.
From there, the Shark may then apply the forward P/E for The Gap of 9.36 as of October 2018 to derive a $1.271 million future valuation. Based on this valuation, a $200,000 investment would roughly equate to a 15% stake in the business.
Game Face Company
The Sharks may remind the entrepreneur that they can't apply the same valuation metrics based on how publicly traded companies are valued. There are massive distinctions between a small business and a public corporation. The Gap is an established retailer with thousands of stores worldwide, while the small business may only have a few locations. While the growth rate is justifiably higher for the small business, the risk is much larger due to the risk of failure and liquidity risk in terms of an exit strategy. Shares in publicly traded companies can be liquidated in the stock market in seconds, which is impossible with stakes in a private small business. C programming books for beginners free download.
Adjusting Valuation Based on Risk
The lack of liquidity creates more risk for the Sharks to bear, which entails applying risk-adjusted discounting to make the reward worth the risk. Based on this factor, the Sharks have much more wiggle room to base their offers on a risk-adjusted discounted valuation.
For example, applying a 50% risk-adjusted discount would bring the stake up to 30% for the $200,000 investment. Sharks can also apply the intangibles that they bring to the table to allow for an even larger discount, perhaps bringing up the stake to 50% for the $200,000 investment.
Game Face After Shark Tank
To counter blowback from the entrepreneurs about giving up too large of a stake in their business, the Sharks make the argument that their leadership, contacts, reputation, and guidance contribute towards building a bigger pie to carve up between them. It would be better to own 50% of a $10 million company compared to 80% of a $1 million company.